http://daneomatic.com/wp/2010/07/15/boundary-physical-digital/ Like tweets, but with grammar. Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:25:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://daneomatic.com/wp/2010/07/15/boundary-physical-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-701 rar745 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:29:22 +0000 http://daneomatic.com/wp/?p=876#comment-701 Hello, Dane. I have just finished reading all of your posts, to date. And the point behind all of your studies seems to be to create meaning. I wish you'd extensively study/explore what THAT means, for I'd love to see what you come up with, and if it would affect your whole chain of reasoning. I've witnessed Guy Kawasaki famously talk about how successful companies/endeavors should "create meaning". And that makes sense to me, though it is certainly esoteric. But as an example, what does it mean for software or websites to create meaning (presumably, in their users)? Is it a recurring and cumulative thing, or is it fresh every time an app is opened or a website is visited? Does a person's own metacognitive skill influence their ability to create meaning in the first place? Are those innumerable people with low metacognition not well-served by products and companies which seek to create meaning, as perhaps they lack the capacity to effectively formulate meaning in the first place? Are Hans & Umbach permanently retired, or does hope yet remain within our virtually :) embodied collective consciousness of colloquialisms, chainsaws, and cartwheels? (metaphorically speaking, of course...) Hello, Dane. I have just finished reading all of your posts, to date. And the point behind all of your studies seems to be to create meaning. I wish you’d extensively study/explore what THAT means, for I’d love to see what you come up with, and if it would affect your whole chain of reasoning. I’ve witnessed Guy Kawasaki famously talk about how successful companies/endeavors should “create meaning”. And that makes sense to me, though it is certainly esoteric. But as an example, what does it mean for software or websites to create meaning (presumably, in their users)? Is it a recurring and cumulative thing, or is it fresh every time an app is opened or a website is visited? Does a person’s own metacognitive skill influence their ability to create meaning in the first place? Are those innumerable people with low metacognition not well-served by products and companies which seek to create meaning, as perhaps they lack the capacity to effectively formulate meaning in the first place? Are Hans & Umbach permanently retired, or does hope yet remain within our virtually :) embodied collective consciousness of colloquialisms, chainsaws, and cartwheels? (metaphorically speaking, of course…)

]]>